Skip to content
The platform

Turn intake into a review-ready case file.

OBE gives your team a review-ready file with the claimant's account, documents, conflicts, and missing information already organized before anyone begins the review. Staff can start with the matter itself. If the firm accepts it, the same record carries into case work.

Example solar matterControlled by the firm
StageRecordStatus
Accepted leadAnswers and uploadsCarried forward
Source reviewProposed facts and pagesOpen
Firm follow-upMissing agreementAssigned
Lawyer reviewDecision stays with firmPending
From intake into the case

One continuous case record from claimant submission to filed action.

Attorneys open the exact same verified record. No one has to re-enter data or hunt through attachments. The firm still decides which matters to accept, and lawyers make the legal calls.
Continuous Case Dossier

Intake data enters litigation-ready before counsel begins drafting.

What reviewers need

Deliver verified facts, cited sources, and conflict alerts upfront.

Evaluate key legal merits immediately using the intake questions and evidence standards your firm already trusts.
01

Claimant Narrative & Version History

Preserve original intake responses alongside timestamped records of every subsequent correction.

02

Pinpoint Source Document Citations

Click directly from an extracted fact to its highlighted paragraph in the uploaded contract.

03

Discrepancy & Conflict Detection

Surface conflicting disclosure dates and contradictory claimant statements side by side for instant verification.

04

Automated Document Gap Analysis

Identify missing records and incomplete answers before scheduling attorney review.

05

Firm-Approved Follow-Up Catalogs

Trigger structured questionnaires and clarifying prompts codified by your firm.

06

Uncompromised Attorney Authority

The firm decides which matters to accept. Lawyers make the legal calls.

Source review

Trace proposed facts directly to the source page and clause.

Recurring documents

Standardize recurring record extraction across matters.

Configure target evidence fields across purchase agreements, financing riders, disclosures, and arbitration clauses for this claim type.

Facts for review

Deterministic evidence anchoring with zero guesswork.

Names, dates, amounts, signatures, clauses, and missing pages stay marked as proposals until an authorized reviewer checks the evidence and confirms or corrects them.

Source review

Open the page behind the proposed fact

Source linked
Illustrative record · Page 6Finance agreement

Dealer payment: $8,750.00

Source region 6.4
Proposed fact · E-014Dealer payment

$8,750.00

Status
Proposed
Review
Attorney pending
Open page 6, inspect the highlighted amount, and correct the proposal before it enters the approved record.
Your intake workflow

Set up one matter type around the way your team works.

Your firm specifies the qualification questions, required exhibits, team permissions, and stage approvals. The workflow adapts instantly as your litigation strategy shifts.
  1. 01
    Map Established Review Gates
    Codify the questionnaire criteria, document checklists, and review gates your staff currently relies on.
  2. 02
    Define Target Evidence Schemas
    Specify the essential contract clauses, financial figures, and disclosure pages checked on every matter.
  3. 03
    Frictionless Claimant Capture
    Guide each claimant through a modern, mobile-friendly intake funnel tailored to that matter type.
  4. 04
    Deterministic Citation Extraction
    Anchor every extracted date, monetary figure, and signature directly to its underlying document page.
  5. 05
    Expose Gaps & Evidentiary Conflicts
    Flag missing attachments and contradictory claimant records before an attorney begins review.
  6. 06
    Litigation-Ready Matter Packages
    When the firm accepts a matter, the organized dossier transitions directly into litigation casework.
CASE PIPELINE ENGINE

Source Extraction

001
Reducto dual-confidence extraction, bounding boxes, geometry

Theory Detection

002
Deterministic statutory catalog, TILA violations, carveouts

Package Delivery

003
Litigation-ready claim ZIPs, citation audits, attorney gates
Accepted-lead handoff

Carry the intake record into lawyer review

Firm controlled
  1. 01
    Accepted leadAnswers and files
  2. 02
    Source reviewFacts linked
  3. 03
    Firm follow-upGaps routed
  4. 04
    Lawyer reviewDecision stays with firm
OBE prepares the record. Lawyers decide whether the firm accepts a matter and what legal action follows.
Ready for a lawyer

Consolidate facts, citations, and conflict maps in one review file.

OBE prepares the file for review. A lawyer decides whether the evidence is complete, whether the matter is legally sufficient, and what the firm should do next.
Example review recordAwaiting lawyer review
StageRecordStatus
ClaimantAnswers and correctionsReview
SourcesPages behind proposed valuesOpen
GapsMissing agreementFollow up
DecisionAcceptance and legal actionFirm decision
AI under firm rules

Firm-governed automation with absolute attorney authority.

Firm-approved AI can prepare source-linked drafts for review. The firm controls which documents each tool can access and which actions require human approval.
A tool can work only with the access, permissions, and integrations the firm gives it. Lawyers remain responsible for legal judgment and client advice.
  1. 01Ingest only the records explicitly assigned by the firm to that matter.
  2. 02Anchor every extracted value directly to its source page and line.
  3. 03Generate source-cited preliminary drafts strictly for human attorney evaluation.
  4. 04Require explicit firm authorization before executing any outbound communication.
Results depend on the records provided, the workflow the firm sets up, its integrations, and the firm's review. OBE does not promise completeness, savings, speed, capacity, or legal outcomes.
Start with one matter type

Show us the intake pipeline your staff spends hours rebuilding.

Bring one current file, including its open questions. We will follow it from first contact through lawyer review and find the points where the record has to be rebuilt.