Skip to content
Problems we solve

Your intake team is doing the system's work.

Leads arrive, but staff still gathers documents, types case facts, checks completeness, chases ownership, and rebuilds the process for every case type. Those are the problems OBE is built to solve.

Ten problems we solve

Where does intake fall back to manual work?

Start with the problem your team hits on every new lead.
01
At lead capture

A lead form is mistaken for intake

Contact details arrive. Intake still happens manually.

02
During document review

Staff manually reads documents and enters case facts

Manual data entry drives burnout and limits scale.

03
During qualification

Case data is not structured for qualification

The firm cannot quickly see the key facts, evidence, gaps, or whether a matter fits its criteria.

04
After first contact

Follow-up is too slow or inconsistent

Leads wait for callbacks and intake invitations.

05
During claimant intake

Claimants struggle to complete intake

Forms, document uploads, and notifications do not fit their device, age, or preferred communication channel.

06
Before review

Missing information is discovered too late

Staff lacks a clear view of which documents, pages, answers, or facts are incomplete.

07
Between intake phases

Nobody clearly owns the next step

Matters stall between intake workers, paralegals, and attorneys because responsibilities and handoffs are unclear.

08
When a program launches

Every case type starts from zero

Questions, required documents, extracted facts, qualification rules, and review stages are rebuilt instead of reused.

09
At engagement

Attorney decisions and engagement are disconnected

Accepting, rejecting, returning, signing, and handing off a matter require separate manual processes.

10
In downstream case work

Unstructured case data produces unreliable AI work

Generic AI tools read raw files without authoritative facts, priorities, or case-specific context.

What should stay human

Keep the call. Remove the clerical work around it.

The first call still matters because a person can listen, reassure the claimant, and explain what happens next. The intake system should handle the repeatable data work: detailed questions, document requests, structured case facts, completeness checks, and the handoff to a reviewer. Firm policy controls acceptance and engagement. Lawyers retain legal judgment, analysis, and client advice.

Human callbackCase-type intakeReviewer decision
What manual intake costs

The file was complete enough to accept. Staff still had to enter it again.

Bennett Legal's annual comparison was $44,000 for Filevine, $21,000 for Moxo, and $22,000 for data extraction pipelines, totaling $87,000, with staff and lawyer time excluded. Accepted intake work still had to be entered again.
Published comparison

Results depend on records, configuration, integrations, and firm review. OBE does not promise completeness, savings, speed, capacity, or legal outcomes.

Read the Bennett Legal case study
Map the intake after the form

Bring us the form, the call, and the handoff that follows.

We will map where each answer and document enters, where staff retypes facts, how missing data is chased, and who owns each phase.